Current:Home > reviewsAppeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies -CapitalSource
Appeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies
View
Date:2025-04-12 05:19:06
Washington — A federal appeals court on Friday temporarily paused a lower court order that limited communications between top Biden administration officials and social media companies about content posted to their platforms.
The three-judge panel for the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals granted the Justice Department's request to put on hold the July 4 preliminary injunction from U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty while legal proceedings continue. It also agreed to expedite the administration's appeal.
The temporary administrative stay will remain in place "until further orders of the court," according to the brief order.
The Justice Department turned to the 5th Circuit for relief after it asked Doughy last week to halt his own order while it pursued an appeal. Doughty, appointed by former President Donald Trump, declined to do so, and in a 13-page ruling rejected the government's assertions that his injunction swept too broadly and threatened to chill lawful conduct.
"Although this Preliminary Injunction involves numerous agencies, it is not as broad as it appears," Doughty wrote. "It only prohibits something the Defendants have no legal right to do — contacting social media companies for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner, the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted on social-media platforms."
The judge reiterated that he believes Missouri and Louisiana, who sued the government last year over federal officials' communications with social media companies during the COVID-19 pandemic and 2020 election cycle, are likely to succeed on the merits of their case.
The states "are likely to prove that all of the enjoined defendants coerced, significantly encouraged, and/or jointly participated [with] social-media companies to suppress social-media posts by American citizens that expressed opinions that were anti-COVID-19 vaccines, anti-COVID-19 lockdowns, posts that delegitimized or questioned the results of the 2020 election, and other content not subject to any exception to the First Amendment," he wrote. "These items are protected free speech and were seemingly censored because of the viewpoints they expressed."
The judge's July 4 injunction blocks top Biden administration officials from communicating with social-media companies "for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted" on their platforms.
Among those covered by the injunction are Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra, Surgeon General Vivek Murthy and White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, as well as several federal agencies.
The order contains several carve-outs, including allowing the Biden administration to inform social media companies of posts involving criminal activity, threats to national security and public safety, and illegal efforts to suppress voting or of foreign attempts to influence elections.
In its request that the injunction be halted, the Justice Department warned that it swept too broadly and is unclear as to what conduct is allowed and who is covered.
The injunction, administration lawyers said, "may be read to prevent the Government from engaging in a vast range of lawful and responsible conduct — including speaking on matters of public concern and working with social media companies on initiatives to prevent grave harm to the American people and our democratic processes."
The lawsuit brought by the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana, as well as several individuals, alleges that senior government officials colluded with social-media companies to suppress viewpoints and content on social media platforms, violating the First Amendment.
Their suit accused platforms like Twitter and Facebook of censoring a New York Post story about the contents of a laptop owned by Hunter Biden, Mr. Biden's son, posts about the origins of COVID-19 and various mitigation measures implemented during the pandemic and speech about the integrity of the 2020 presidential election.
- In:
- Biden Administration
- Social Media
veryGood! (55)
Related
- Former Syrian official arrested in California who oversaw prison charged with torture
- Video shows the Buffalo tornado that broke New York's record as the 26th this year
- Supreme Court shuts down Missouri’s long shot push to lift Trump’s gag order in hush-money case
- 9 killed when an overloaded SUV flips into a canal in rural South Florida, authorities say
- Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
- Cystic acne can cause pain, shame and lasting scars. Here's what causes it.
- USA vs. Germany live updates: USWNT lineup, start time for Olympics semifinal
- What is a carry trade, and how did a small rate hike in Japan trigger a global sell-off?
- Federal hiring is about to get the Trump treatment
- Families whose loved ones were left rotting in funeral home owed $950 million, judge rules
Ranking
- 'Squid Game' without subtitles? Duolingo, Netflix encourage fans to learn Korean
- USA vs. Germany live updates: USWNT lineup, start time for Olympics semifinal
- Chic Desert Aunt Is the Latest Aesthetic Trend, Achieve the Boho Vibes with These Styles & Accessories
- SEC, Big Ten domination headlines US LBM Coaches Poll winners and losers
- NHL in ASL returns, delivering American Sign Language analysis for Deaf community at Winter Classic
- Algerian boxer Imane Khelif in Olympic women's semifinals: How to watch
- TikToker David Allen, Known as ToTouchAnEmu, Mourns Death of 5-Week-Old Baby Girl
- Meet the flower-loving, glitter-wearing, ukulele-playing USA skater fighting for medal
Recommendation
'Kraven the Hunter' spoilers! Let's dig into that twisty ending, supervillain reveal
One Extraordinary (Olympic) Photo: Lee Jin-man captures diver at the center of the Olympic rings
Finding Reno’s hot spots; volunteers to measure Northern Nevada’s warmest neighborhoods
Sabrina Carpenter Makes Rare Comment About Boyfriend Barry Keoghan
Romantasy reigns on spicy BookTok: Recommendations from the internet’s favorite genre
Za'Darius Smith carted off field, adding to Browns' defensive injury concerns
Why do athletes ring the bell at Stade de France at 2024 Paris Olympics? What to know
Save Up to 40% Off at The North Face's 2024 End-of-Season Sale: Bestselling Styles Starting at Just $21